<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s time for the City Council to weigh in on the Oakland Airport Connector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/its-time-for-the-city-council-to-weigh-in-on-the-oakland-airport-connector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/its-time-for-the-city-council-to-weigh-in-on-the-oakland-airport-connector/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Becks</title>
		<link>http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/its-time-for-the-city-council-to-weigh-in-on-the-oakland-airport-connector/#comment-3216</link>
		<dc:creator>Becks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/?p=1679#comment-3216</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bruce, and that&#039;s great news about Ignacio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bruce, and that&#8217;s great news about Ignacio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Nye</title>
		<link>http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/its-time-for-the-city-council-to-weigh-in-on-the-oakland-airport-connector/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Nye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/?p=1679#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>Becks,

Having followed this issue for some time, and having become increasingly furious about it, I e-mailed Brunner, Quan and DeLaFuente urging them to get it on the 7/14 Public Works Budget.  Within ten minutes I had a Blackberry response from Ignacio saying he agreed and that on Thursday he would urge it go on agenda for discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becks,</p>
<p>Having followed this issue for some time, and having become increasingly furious about it, I e-mailed Brunner, Quan and DeLaFuente urging them to get it on the 7/14 Public Works Budget.  Within ten minutes I had a Blackberry response from Ignacio saying he agreed and that on Thursday he would urge it go on agenda for discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dto510</title>
		<link>http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/its-time-for-the-city-council-to-weigh-in-on-the-oakland-airport-connector/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>dto510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oaklandliving.wordpress.com/?p=1679#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>I think at this point the MTC is going to assume that Oakland doesn&#039;t want the Connector if the Council doesn&#039;t weigh in on it. At every single meeting, there are more opponents than supporters, and BART is unable to point to anything from Oakland&#039;s Council that they approve of or even agree to allow this project. BART asking that Oakland not discuss it until after funding is secured shows that they don&#039;t think they have the Council&#039;s support either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think at this point the MTC is going to assume that Oakland doesn&#8217;t want the Connector if the Council doesn&#8217;t weigh in on it. At every single meeting, there are more opponents than supporters, and BART is unable to point to anything from Oakland&#8217;s Council that they approve of or even agree to allow this project. BART asking that Oakland not discuss it until after funding is secured shows that they don&#8217;t think they have the Council&#8217;s support either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
